↓ Skip to main content

The Enduring Impact of What Clinicians Say to People With Low Back Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Family Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 2,393)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
507 X users
facebook
101 Facebook pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
6 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
6 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
861 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Enduring Impact of What Clinicians Say to People With Low Back Pain
Published in
Annals of Family Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1370/afm.1518
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the formation and impact of attitudes and beliefs among people experiencing acute and chronic low back pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 507 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 861 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 850 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 149 17%
Other 109 13%
Student > Bachelor 103 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 7%
Other 182 21%
Unknown 188 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 261 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 222 26%
Sports and Recreations 40 5%
Psychology 28 3%
Neuroscience 19 2%
Other 73 8%
Unknown 218 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 444. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2026.
All research outputs
#80,823
of 34,601,984 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Family Medicine
#19
of 2,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#451
of 261,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Family Medicine
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.