↓ Skip to main content

Physical activity practice, body image and visual impairment: A comparison between Brazilian and Italian children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Developmental Disabilities, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Physical activity practice, body image and visual impairment: A comparison between Brazilian and Italian children and adolescents
Published in
Research in Developmental Disabilities, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.020
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the physical activity and body image of children and adolescents with visual impairment (VI) in Brazil and Italy. For this, 41 children and adolescents with VI (19 Brazilian and 22 Italian) aged 10.22 ± 2.19 years old (18 girls and 23 boys) answered the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Children (PAQ-C), the Offer Self-Image Questionnaire (OSIQ), and an instrument with information about the disability, body weight and height. We analyzed the relationship between data from PAQ-C and OSIQ, as well as the gender, level of disability (blindness or low vision) and country using independent Mann-Whitney test. Body mass index (BMI) values were higher for Brazilian youths, with more than half of them classified as overweight and obese. Italian youths exhibited values of body image that were more positive and only 27% presented overweight or obesity. Blind children and adolescents were less active than those with low vision, but no differences were found between countries or genders. In Brazil, we detected significant correlations (p>0.05) between physical activity, body image and BMI, which more active youths presenting lower values of BMI and a better perception of body image. Physical activity seems to have a positive influence on body image and BMI for children and adolescents with VI, thus it should be encouraged especially for those with higher disability degrees.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 139 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 15%
Psychology 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,784,781
of 27,265,592 outputs
Outputs from Research in Developmental Disabilities
#452
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,212
of 229,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Developmental Disabilities
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,265,592 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.