↓ Skip to main content

Methodological differences between pharmacological treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder: what to do for the clinicians?

Overview of attention for article published in Comprehensive Psychiatry, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methodological differences between pharmacological treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder: what to do for the clinicians?
Published in
Comprehensive Psychiatry, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.10.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Cameroon 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 40%
Psychology 16 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,578,471
of 27,014,701 outputs
Outputs from Comprehensive Psychiatry
#640
of 1,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,676
of 196,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comprehensive Psychiatry
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,014,701 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.