↓ Skip to main content

A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Trials, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
patent
24 patents

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials
Published in
Clinical Trials, October 2010
DOI 10.1177/1740774510382799
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Ji, Ping Liu, Yisheng Li, B. Nebiyou Bekele

Abstract

Building on earlier work, the toxicity probability interval (TPI) method, we present a modified TPI (mTPI) design that is calibration-free for phase I trials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 22%
Other 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Master 7 6%
Professor 6 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 32 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,864,754
of 32,956,775 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Trials
#94
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,548
of 146,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Trials
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,956,775 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them