↓ Skip to main content

Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Education, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores
Published in
Medical Education, November 2013
DOI 10.1111/medu.12283
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent reviews have claimed that the script concordance test (SCT) methodology generally produces reliable and valid assessments of clinical reasoning and that the SCT may soon be suitable for high-stakes testing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 14 12%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 36 30%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,033,952
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Medical Education
#631
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,360
of 232,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Education
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.