↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic or Food-Derived Vitamin C—Are They Equally Bioavailable?

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrients, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
twitter
43 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
8 Facebook pages
reddit
53 Redditors
q&a
5 Q&A threads
video
9 YouTube creators
podcasts
3 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Synthetic or Food-Derived Vitamin C—Are They Equally Bioavailable?
Published in
Nutrients, October 2013
DOI 10.3390/nu5114284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 397 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 84 21%
Student > Master 48 12%
Researcher 34 8%
Other 21 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 5%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 149 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Chemistry 15 4%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 162 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2026.
All research outputs
#194,379
of 34,614,958 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#918
of 28,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,170
of 262,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#3
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,614,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.