↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and Economic Consequences of Early Cancer After Kidney Transplantation in Contemporary Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Transplantation, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Clinical and Economic Consequences of Early Cancer After Kidney Transplantation in Contemporary Practice
Published in
Transplantation, April 2017
DOI 10.1097/tp.0000000000001385
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Current clinical and economic consequences of cancer after kidney transplantation are incompletely defined. We examined United States Renal Data System records of Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000-2011 to determine clinical and economic impacts of cancer diagnosed within the first 3 years posttransplantation. Cancer diagnoses were identified using Medicare billing codes and categorized as nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC), viral-linked and "other" cancers. Associations of cancers with mortality and graft loss were estimated by time-varying Cox regression. Impacts of cancer diagnoses on inpatient and outpatient costs within each year were quantified by multivariate linear regression modeling. Among 67,157 recipients, by 3 years posttransplant, NMSC was diagnosed in 5.7%, viral-linked in 1.9%, and "other" cancers in 6.3%. Viral-linked cancer was associated with more than 3-fold increased risk in subsequent mortality until the third transplant anniversary, and nearly twice the mortality risk after year 3. "Other" cancers had similar associations with death and graft loss, while NMSC was associated with 33% higher mortality beyond the third year posttransplant. Viral-linked cancer had the largest inpatient and outpatient cost impacts per case, followed by "other", while NMSC impacted only outpatient costs. Care of new cancer diagnoses was generally more costly than care of previously established diagnoses. Cancer accounted for 3%-5.5% of total inpatient Medicare expenditures and 1.5%-3.3% of outpatient expenditures in the first 3 years posttransplant. Early posttransplant malignancy is an expensive and morbid condition that warrants attention in efforts to improve pretransplant screening and management protocols before and after transplant.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,855,145
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Transplantation
#215
of 10,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,382
of 351,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplantation
#6
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.