↓ Skip to main content

Differential Validity for Cognitive Ability Tests in Employment and Educational Settings: Not Much More Than Range Restriction?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Differential Validity for Cognitive Ability Tests in Employment and Educational Settings: Not Much More Than Range Restriction?
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0034377
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 97 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 22%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 11 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#10,992,752
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#1,851
of 3,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,281
of 359,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#21
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.