↓ Skip to main content

Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Current practice in the use of MEGA-PRESS spectroscopy for the detection of GABA
Published in
NeuroImage, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of edited proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy for the detection of GABA in the human brain. At a recent meeting held at Cardiff University, a number of spectroscopy groups met to discuss the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of GABA-edited MR spectra. This paper aims to set out the issues discussed at this meeting, reporting areas of consensus around parameters and procedures in the field and highlighting those areas where differences remain. It is hoped that this paper can fulfill two needs, providing a summary of the current 'state-of-the-art' in the field of GABA-edited MRS at 3T using MEGA-PRESS and a basic guide to help researchers new to the field to avoid some of the pitfalls inherent in the acquisition and processing of edited MRS for GABA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 590 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 20%
Researcher 110 18%
Student > Master 79 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 5%
Other 116 19%
Unknown 131 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 124 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 13%
Psychology 72 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 8%
Physics and Astronomy 33 5%
Other 91 15%
Unknown 174 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2025.
All research outputs
#7,172,905
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#4,603
of 13,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,154
of 342,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#42
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.