↓ Skip to main content

Varespladib and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome: The VISTA-16 Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
32 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Varespladib and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With an Acute Coronary Syndrome: The VISTA-16 Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.282836
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) generates bioactive phospholipid products implicated in atherosclerosis. The sPLA2 inhibitor varespladib has favorable effects on lipid and inflammatory markers; however, its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 12%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 19 8%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 75 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 86 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2026.
All research outputs
#551,198
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,790
of 42,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,803
of 393,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#70
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.