↓ Skip to main content

How to improve the gluten-free diet: The state of the art from a food science perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Food Research International, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How to improve the gluten-free diet: The state of the art from a food science perspective
Published in
Food Research International, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.04.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The celiac disease is the most common food intolerance and its prevalence is increasing. Consequently, use of gluten-free diet has expanded, notwithstanding consumption as therapy for other gluten-related disorders or by wellbeing people without any medical prescription. Even the therapeutic efficiency has undoubtedly proven, several drawbacks mainly regarding the compliance, nutritional deficits and related diseases, and the alteration of the intestinal microbiota have described in the literature. Food science has been considered as one of the primary area of intervention to limit or eliminate such drawbacks. Efforts have approached shelf life, rheology and palatability aspects but more recently have mainly focused to improve the nutritional features of the gluten-free diet, and to propose dietary alternatives. The sourdough fermentation has shown the most promising results, also including a biotechnology strategy that has allowed the complete degradation of gluten prior to consumption.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 339 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Master 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 14 4%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 146 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 19%
Engineering 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 5%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 166 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,933,999
of 26,802,131 outputs
Outputs from Food Research International
#252
of 4,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,654
of 329,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Research International
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,802,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.