↓ Skip to main content

The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Athletic Training, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The 6-plus-person lift transfer technique compared with other methods of spine boarding.
Published in
Journal of Athletic Training, January 2008
DOI 10.4085/1062-6050-43.1.6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Del Rossi, Mary Beth H. Horodyski, Bryan P. Conrad, Christian P. Di Paola, Matthew J. Di Paola, Glenn R. Rechtine

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 25%
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 5 7%
Researcher 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 13%
Engineering 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#10,318,498
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Athletic Training
#1,396
of 2,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,741
of 226,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Athletic Training
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.