↓ Skip to main content

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome-A Survey-Based Approach to Understanding Symptoms and Cannabis Use Patterns

Overview of attention for article published in Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, March 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
reddit
5 Redditors
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome-A Survey-Based Approach to Understanding Symptoms and Cannabis Use Patterns
Published in
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, March 2026
DOI 10.1177/25785125261421434
Pubmed ID
Authors

Codi Peterson, Jill Simonian, Megan Mbengue, Jacqueline Higgins, Riley Kirk, Katie Nava, Ryan Lacinski, Ariana Nelson

Abstract

Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is increasingly being observed in emergency departments and is characterized by recurrent nausea and vomiting in some cannabis users. Despite its increasing prevalence, tools for early identification and intervention are lacking. This study aimed to improve our understanding of CHS by examining patterns of cannabis use and identifying symptom profiles of individuals suspected or diagnosed with CHS. By identifying the risk factors and initial warning signs, we can support earlier recognition, harm reduction, and intervention. An anonymous survey was distributed via social media to gather detailed, self-reported information about cannabis consumption methods, frequency of use, product sourcing, and CHS-related symptoms. Participants were recruited online through organic outreach to CHS-focused social media communities in late 2024. A total of 1134 participants were included in the final analysis. Most respondents reported smoking cannabis flower or using vape cartridges, although the use of edibles and concentrates were also described. The overwhelming majority of respondents (96.5%) used cannabis products at least daily, with approximately half (45%) using them six or more times per day around the time they developed CHS symptoms. Most of the respondents (61.9%) sourced cannabis from licensed dispensaries. The duration of cannabis use prior to symptom onset varied widely among participants, with nearly two-thirds (65.4%) reportedly used for more than 3 years before symptom development. During the prodromal (early) phase, symptoms clustered in the morning (63.1%) and the predominant complaints were nausea and stomach pain. Women reported more frequent and prolonged symptoms than men. Our findings suggest that CHS is most associated with long-term, frequent use of inhaled delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) dominant cannabis. The acquisition source of cannabis products did not affect the syndrome presentation. Although many different cannabis consumption methods were represented, smoking and vape cartridges were the most commonly reported. The use of vape cartridges was associated with a shorter time to the development of CHS symptoms. Increased awareness of these patterns could improve the early recognition and management of CHS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 63%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2026.
All research outputs
#939,279
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
#114
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,946
of 359,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.