↓ Skip to main content

Do adults with cardiovascular disease risk show meaningful reactivity to physical activity measurement? Coordinated analysis across six studies

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Health Psychology, March 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
bluesky
5 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Do adults with cardiovascular disease risk show meaningful reactivity to physical activity measurement? Coordinated analysis across six studies
Published in
British Journal of Health Psychology, March 2026
DOI 10.1111/bjhp.70063
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To estimate the extent of physical activity (PA) measurement reactivity among adults ages 40-60 with risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), to inform best practices for addressing reactivity in PA research and intervention. Coordinated secondary analysis across six datasets from studies that used 6-7 days of observation following the introduction of PA measurement devices. Moderators of interest were demographic and study design characteristics. We included data from participants ages 40-60 with ≥1 CVD factors who provided device-assessed PA behaviour across 6-7 days (N = 1825). We used multilevel modelling to examine participants' PA behaviour (i.e., activity units, steps per day) across days, with decreases in activity indicating reactivity. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < .05 and standardized effect sizes of interest were semipartial correlation coefficients (srs) ≥.25; we also report conversions to Cohen's d and corresponding equivalence tests. No patterns met both criteria for significance for either main or moderation effects, including tests of study design features. Results from one small study showed a decrease in steps per day across days of observation (p = .15, sr = .26, d = .23, 90% CI: -.03, .50), though men showed an increase in steps per day (whereas women decreased). Adults in midlife with CVD risk factors show little evidence of PA measurement reactivity. We recommend continuing to examine PA patterns in individual studies, though widespread use of burdensome procedures to prevent reactivity is not warranted in this at-risk population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2026.
All research outputs
#4,329,941
of 32,823,751 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Health Psychology
#329
of 1,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,624
of 352,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Health Psychology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,823,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.