In schizophrenia employment rate is dramatically low, also among patients receiving job support interventions. Recent studies showed a direct relationship between neurocognitive deficits and work functioning, as well as proving the benefits of combined neurocognitive and work interventions. Current evidence also supports a role of Theory of Mind (ToM), on work functioning. However, the effect of integrated rehabilitation programmes including a social cognitive training on job outcome is still less explored. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate the relationship between work competence and clinical factors, neurocognitive and ToM abilities, as well as to explore the effect of neurocognitive and ToM treatments combined with work therapy. Thirty-seven outpatients with schizophrenia were assigned to either a Computer-assisted Cognitive Remediation (CACR) plus work therapy group (WTG) or to CACR and WTG added to ToM Intervention, both followed by a job support programme. All patients were assessed for psychopathology, neurocognition, ToM and work functioning. Work outcome was significantly predicted by age at onset, neurocognitive abilities and the degree of ToM improvement after the specific intervention. This study provides preliminary insight on predictors of work competence in schizophrenia, highlighting the importance of ToM abilities.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2017.
All research outputs
#22,326,709
of 28,257,452 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
#680
of 813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,038
of 331,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,257,452 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
