| Title |
A systematic review of pragmatic language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0172242 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
There is a need for evidence based interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to limit the life-long, psychosocial impact of pragmatic language impairments. This systematic review identified 22 studies reporting on 20 pragmatic language interventions for children with ASD aged 0-18 years. The characteristics of each study, components of the interventions, and the methodological quality of each study were reviewed. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of 15 interventions. Results revealed some promising approaches, indicating that active inclusion of the child and parent in the intervention was a significant mediator of intervention effect. Participant age, therapy setting or modality were not significant mediators between the interventions and measures of pragmatic language. The long-term effects of these interventions and the generalisation of learning to new contexts is largely unknown. Implications for clinical practice and directions for future research are discussed. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 31% |
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 69% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 417 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Researcher | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 16% |
| Unknown | 168 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 78 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 26 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 11% |
| Unknown | 185 | 44% |