↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of pragmatic language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A systematic review of pragmatic language interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0172242
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a need for evidence based interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) to limit the life-long, psychosocial impact of pragmatic language impairments. This systematic review identified 22 studies reporting on 20 pragmatic language interventions for children with ASD aged 0-18 years. The characteristics of each study, components of the interventions, and the methodological quality of each study were reviewed. Meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of 15 interventions. Results revealed some promising approaches, indicating that active inclusion of the child and parent in the intervention was a significant mediator of intervention effect. Participant age, therapy setting or modality were not significant mediators between the interventions and measures of pragmatic language. The long-term effects of these interventions and the generalisation of learning to new contexts is largely unknown. Implications for clinical practice and directions for future research are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 417 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 43 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Researcher 30 7%
Other 17 4%
Other 68 16%
Unknown 168 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 10%
Social Sciences 26 6%
Linguistics 26 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 4%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 185 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2026.
All research outputs
#2,416,882
of 34,351,437 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,242
of 224,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,453
of 355,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#537
of 4,941 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,351,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,941 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.