↓ Skip to main content

Lack of Utility of a Decision Support System to Mitigate Delays in Admission from the Operating Room to the Postanesthesia Care Unit

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lack of Utility of a Decision Support System to Mitigate Delays in Admission from the Operating Room to the Postanesthesia Care Unit
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, December 2013
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3182a8b0bd
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

When the phase I postanesthesia care unit (PACU) is at capacity, completed cases need to be held in the operating room (OR), causing a "PACU delay." Statistical methods based on historical data can optimize PACU staffing to achieve the least possible labor cost at a given service level. A decision support process to alert PACU charge nurses that the PACU is at or near maximum census might be effective in lessening the incidence of delays and reducing over-utilized OR time, but only if alerts are timely (i.e., neither too late nor too early to act upon) and the PACU slot can be cleared quickly. We evaluated the maximum potential benefit of such a system, using assumptions deliberately biased toward showing utility.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Other 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Librarian 5 5%
Other 24 26%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Engineering 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 7%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2019.
All research outputs
#23,095,272
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#8,431
of 11,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,100
of 379,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#37
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.