↓ Skip to main content

Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
406 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, February 2011
DOI 10.3390/ijerph8020565
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Consumption of bottled water is increasing worldwide. Prior research shows many consumers believe bottled water is convenient and has better taste than tap water, despite reports of a number of water quality incidents with bottled water. The authors explore the demographic and social factors associated with bottled water users in the U.S. and the relationship between bottled water use and perceptions of the quality of local water supply. They find that U.S. consumers are more likely to report bottled water as their primary drinking water source when they perceive that drinking water is not safe. Furthermore, those who give lower ratings to the quality of their ground water are more likely to regularly purchase bottle water for drinking and use bottle water as their primary drinking water source.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 397 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 17%
Student > Bachelor 67 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 11%
Researcher 39 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 4%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 103 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 67 17%
Engineering 38 9%
Social Sciences 37 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 6%
Other 87 21%
Unknown 120 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2026.
All research outputs
#600,466
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#1,186
of 35,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,821
of 160,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.