↓ Skip to main content

Two new Cenozoic fossil species of Amphithyris (Brachiopoda) from North Otago, New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, March 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Two new Cenozoic fossil species of Amphithyris (Brachiopoda) from North Otago, New Zealand
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, March 2026
DOI 10.1071/rs25009
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2026.
All research outputs
#11,331,010
of 32,125,052 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria
#21
of 52 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,740
of 188,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,125,052 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.