You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward Identifying the Next Generation of Superfund and Hazardous Waste Site Contaminants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1289/ehp.1002497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wendell P. Ela, David L. Sedlak, Morton A. Barlaz, Heather F. Henry, Derek C.G. Muir, Deborah L. Swackhamer, Eric J. Weber, Robert G. Arnold, P. Lee Ferguson, Jennifer A. Field, Edward T. Furlong, John P. Giesy, Rolf U. Halden, Tala Henry, Ronald A. Hites, Keri C. Hornbuckle, Philip H. Howard, Richard G. Luthy, Anita K. Meyer, A. Eduardo Sáez, Frederick S. vom Saal, Chris D. Vulpe, Mark R. Wiesner |
| Abstract |
This commentary evolved from a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences titled "Superfund Contaminants: The Next Generation" held in Tucson, Arizona, in August 2009. All the authors were workshop participants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 25% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#7,735
of 8,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,315
of 108,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#80
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.