↓ Skip to main content

Exploring anxiety symptoms in a large‐scale twin study of children with autism spectrum disorders, their co‐twins and controls

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring anxiety symptoms in a large‐scale twin study of children with autism spectrum disorders, their co‐twins and controls
Published in
Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, July 2013
DOI 10.1111/jcpp.12068
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although many children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) experience difficulties with anxiety,the manifestation of these difficulties remains unresolved. The current study assessed anxiety in a large population based twin sample, aged 10–15 years. Phenotypic analyses were used to explore anxiety symptoms in children with ASDs, their unaffected co-twins and a control sample.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 13%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 95 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2014.
All research outputs
#3,641,228
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#1,244
of 3,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,755
of 243,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry
#5
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.