↓ Skip to main content

Psychological treatments for perinatal depression

Overview of attention for article published in Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Psychological treatments for perinatal depression
Published in
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, October 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.09.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 268 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Researcher 22 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 80 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 23%
Psychology 56 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 87 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2015.
All research outputs
#9,062,041
of 27,264,936 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#445
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,651
of 226,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,264,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.