↓ Skip to main content

Are pet cats bad for wildlife?

Overview of attention for article published in Pacific Conservation Biology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Are pet cats bad for wildlife?
Published in
Pacific Conservation Biology, September 2010
DOI 10.1071/pc100155
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2023.
All research outputs
#29,119,686
of 32,233,056 outputs
Outputs from Pacific Conservation Biology
#515
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,647
of 139,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pacific Conservation Biology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,233,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.