↓ Skip to main content

Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
990 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010013.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common long-term conditions worldwide, which places considerable pressure on patients, communities and health systems. The major international clinical guidelines now recommend the inclusion of self management programmes in the routine management of patients with asthma. These programmes have been associated with improved outcomes in patients with asthma. However, the implementation of self management programmes in clinical practice, and their uptake by patients, is still poor. Recent developments in mobile technology, such as smartphone and tablet computer apps, could help develop a platform for the delivery of self management interventions that are highly customisable, low-cost and easily accessible.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 990 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 <1%
United States 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 958 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 157 16%
Researcher 113 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 11%
Student > Bachelor 90 9%
Other 59 6%
Other 187 19%
Unknown 275 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 249 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 137 14%
Computer Science 57 6%
Social Sciences 52 5%
Psychology 50 5%
Other 126 13%
Unknown 319 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,190,851
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,163
of 14,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,622
of 377,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.