↓ Skip to main content

Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two‐stage revision

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient reported outcome measures after revision of the infected TKR: comparison of single versus two‐stage revision
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00167-012-2090-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Two-stage revision is the 'gold standard' treatment for infected total knee replacement. Single-stage revision has been successful in the hip and, in carefully chosen knee revisions, may offer the advantage of a single surgical insult with improved functional outcome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Other 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 59%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Mathematics 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#10,345,755
of 30,031,778 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,375
of 3,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,264
of 192,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,031,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.