↓ Skip to main content

Asthma exacerbations · 5: Assessment and management of severe asthma in adults in hospital

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Asthma exacerbations · 5: Assessment and management of severe asthma in adults in hospital
Published in
Thorax, April 2007
DOI 10.1136/thx.2005.045203
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

It is difficult to understand why there is such a huge discrepancy between the management of severe asthma recommended by evidence-based guidelines and that observed in clinical practice. The recommendations are relatively straightforward and have been widely promoted both in guidelines and reviews. Specialist physicians need to be more proactive in their implementation of such guidelines through the use of locally derived protocols and assessment sheets, reinforced by audit. The common occurrence of severe asthma and its considerable burden to the community would support such an approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Master 32 16%
Student > Postgraduate 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 53 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 54 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2026.
All research outputs
#9,244,691
of 31,916,488 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#3,670
of 7,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,730
of 116,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,916,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.