↓ Skip to main content

Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest and Hypothermia: A New Paradigm

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest and Hypothermia: A New Paradigm
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11910-010-0148-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Before the use of hypothermia as a treatment for comatose post-cardiac arrest patients, several prognostic variables were widely accepted as reliable and valid for the prediction of poor outcome. Recent studies using hypothermia have reported on patients with recovery of consciousness in spite of absent or extensor motor responses after 3 days, absent bilateral cortical N20 responses after 24 h, serum neuron-specific enolase levels greater than 33 μg/L, and early myoclonus status epilepticus. Hypothermia and its associated use of sedative and paralytic agents may delay neurologic recovery and affect the optimal timing of prognostic variables. Recent developments in brain imaging may provide additional objective prognostic information and deserve further study. Pending the results of future validation studies in patients treated with hypothermia, we recommend that irreversible management decisions not be made based on a single prognostic parameter, and, if there is uncertainty, these decisions be delayed for several days to allow for repeated testing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 99 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#21,447,033
of 31,959,560 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#816
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,383
of 142,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,959,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.