↓ Skip to main content

AI-enabled exploitation of open science: a response to Zil-E-Ali on safeguarding data research integrity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, March 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
4 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
AI-enabled exploitation of open science: a response to Zil-E-Ali on safeguarding data research integrity
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, March 2026
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2026.
All research outputs
#21,436,852
of 34,531,973 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#3,862
of 5,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,830
of 359,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#25
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,531,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.