↓ Skip to main content

The influence of ‘Slacklining’ on quadriceps rehabilitation, activation and intensity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The influence of ‘Slacklining’ on quadriceps rehabilitation, activation and intensity
Published in
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine and compare the level of quadriceps activation for knee injured participants during kinetic open-chain, closed-chain and composite-chain (Slackline) clinical exercises. Quadriceps activation is a critical component of lower limb movement and subsequently, rehabilitation. However, selective activation can be difficult due to pain, loss of function and impaired neuro-motor activation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 25%
Student > Master 20 18%
Researcher 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Sports and Recreations 19 17%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,831,010
of 33,052,206 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#702
of 3,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,458
of 366,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
#12
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,052,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.