↓ Skip to main content

Techno-economic potential of bioethanol from bamboo in China

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Techno-economic potential of bioethanol from bamboo in China
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-6-173
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bamboo is potentially an interesting feedstock for advanced bioethanol production in China due to its natural abundance, rapid growth, perennial nature and low management requirements. Liquid hot water (LHW) pretreatment was selected as a promising technology to enhance sugar release from bamboo lignocellulose whilst keeping economic and environmental costs to a minimum. The present research was conducted to assess: 1) by how much LHW pretreatment can enhance sugar yields in bamboo, and 2) whether this process has the potential to be economically feasible for biofuel use at the commercial scale. Pretreatments were performed at temperatures of 170-190°C for 10-30 minutes, followed by enzymatic saccharification with a commercial enzyme cocktail at various loadings. These data were then used as inputs to a techno-economic model using AspenPlus™ to determine the production cost of bioethanol from bamboo in China.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Indonesia 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 179 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 61 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 19%
Engineering 24 13%
Chemical Engineering 19 10%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,435,341
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#98
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,971
of 378,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.