Surgical options have emerged as effective treatments to mitigate obesity-associated co-morbidities leading to reduced mortality risk. Despite the benefits of bariatric surgery, a low portion of the eligible population undergoes weight loss procedures.
To determine if regional disparities exist among bariatric patients in the United States and potential effects of any difference SETTING: National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of the NIS database from 2003-2010. We identified 4 regions of the United States; Northeast, Midwest, West, and South. Endpoints included race, payor status, co-morbidities, urban/rural areas, institutional academic status, surgeon, and institutional volume. The sample was analyzed using χ(2) tests, linear regression, and multivariate logistical regression analysis.
A total of 132,342 cases and 636,320 controls were studied. A majority of the study population was female (62.5%) and white (70.0%) with private insurance (42.0%). The highest prevalence of obesity was identified in the South (39.7%) and the lowest in the Midwest (17.1%). The greatest numbers of bariatric procedures are performed in the Northeast (24.4%) compared with the South (13.9%) and Midwest (13%). After controlling for demographic characteristics, the proportion of procedures performed in the Northeast compared with the South (odds ratio .52, confidence interval .40-.66; P<.001) and Midwest (odds ratio .50, confidence interval .33-.75; P<.005) was significant.
Significant disparities in bariatric procedures performed were identified in the South and Midwest regions compared with the Northeast. Although the South has a higher prevalence of obesity, thus it could be suggested by outreach programs.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,605,790
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
#1,283
of 1,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,896
of 324,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
