↓ Skip to main content

Bulimia nervosa‐nonpurging subtype: Closer to the bulimia nervosa‐purging subtype or to binge eating disorder?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bulimia nervosa‐nonpurging subtype: Closer to the bulimia nervosa‐purging subtype or to binge eating disorder?
Published in
International Journal of Eating Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/eat.22218
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

DSM-5 has dropped subtyping of bulimia nervosa (BN), opting to continue inclusion of the somewhat contentious diagnosis of BN-nonpurging subtype (BN-NP) within a broad BN category. Some contend however that BN-NP is more like binge eating disorder (BED) than BN-P. This study examines clinical characteristics, eating disorder symptomatology, and Axis I comorbidity in BN-NP, BN-P, and BED groups to establish whether BN-NP more closely resembles BN-P or BED.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 10 5%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 64 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,263,667
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#1,964
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,899
of 317,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.