↓ Skip to main content

National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
policy
9 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2001
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10123.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Caring for the elderly with dementia imposes a substantial burden on family members and likely accounts for more than half of the total cost of dementia for those living in the community. However, most past estimates of this cost were derived from small, nonrepresentative samples. We sought to obtain nationally representative estimates of the time and associated cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with mild, moderate, and severe dementia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 98 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 25 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 18%
Psychology 12 12%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 5%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2026.
All research outputs
#382,069
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#308
of 10,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222
of 66,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.