↓ Skip to main content

The effect of polymeric formula on enterocyte differentiation

Overview of attention for article published in Innate Immunity, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of polymeric formula on enterocyte differentiation
Published in
Innate Immunity, January 2017
DOI 10.1177/1753425916689333
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exclusive enteral nutrition is established as an initial therapy to induce remission in active Crohn's disease (CD), especially in children, but the mechanisms of action of this therapy are yet to be fully defined. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), a recognised marker of enterocyte differentiation, is implicated in the innate gut immune response to enteric pathogens. Using the Caco-2 human adenocarcinoma cell line, this study showed that the incubation of human cells with a polymeric formula (PF) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the expression of IAP on the cell surface. While further investigation is required to determine the pathway(s) involved, this finding suggests that cell surface-associated IAP may be an aspect of the gut's innate immune response to pathogenic bacteria that is strengthened by PF in the setting of CD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Innate Immunity
#421
of 547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,537
of 417,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Innate Immunity
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 547 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.