↓ Skip to main content

Three Different Ways to Skin a Cat: Financialization in the Emergence of National e-ID Solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Technology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Three Different Ways to Skin a Cat: Financialization in the Emergence of National e-ID Solutions
Published in
Journal of Information Technology, March 2018
DOI 10.1057/s41265-017-0036-8
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Student > Master 32 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 11%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 74 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 49 19%
Social Sciences 43 17%
Computer Science 40 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 81 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#19,313,141
of 28,007,560 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Technology
#150
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,594
of 349,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Technology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,007,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.