↓ Skip to main content

The Mouse Age Phenome Knowledgebase and Disease-Specific Inter-Species Age Mapping

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Mouse Age Phenome Knowledgebase and Disease-Specific Inter-Species Age Mapping
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0081114
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Similarities between mice and humans lead to generation of many mouse models of human disease. However, differences between the species often result in mice being unreliable as preclinical models for human disease. One difference that might play a role in lowering the predictivity of mice models to human diseases is age. Despite the important role age plays in medicine, it is too often considered only casually when considering mouse models.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
Unknown 70 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 17 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2015.
All research outputs
#24,756,754
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#157,368
of 224,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,470
of 377,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,970
of 5,481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.