↓ Skip to main content

Percutaneous retrograde left ventricular assist support for interventions in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Percutaneous retrograde left ventricular assist support for interventions in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction
Published in
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis), April 2012
DOI 10.1002/ccd.24303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,816,865
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#723
of 4,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,606
of 211,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (Formerly Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis)
#8
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.