↓ Skip to main content

Incidence, trends and demographics of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Auckland, New Zealand, 2001–2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence, trends and demographics of Staphylococcus aureus infections in Auckland, New Zealand, 2001–2011
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-569
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

New Zealand has a higher incidence of Staphylococcus aureus disease than other developed countries, with significant sociodemographic variation in incidence rates. In contrast to North America, the majority of disease is due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), although relatively little is known about the comparative demographics of MSSA and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections in New Zealand.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#10,846,634
of 33,738,238 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,772
of 10,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,152
of 375,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#52
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,738,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.