We sought to develop a risk-adjustment methodology for length of stay in congenital heart surgery, as none exist.
Prospective cohort analysis combined with previously obtained retrospective cohort analysis of a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery clinical database.
Patients discharged from Boston Children's Hospital between October 1, 2006, and May 31, 2014, that underwent a congenital heart surgery procedure(s) linked to one of 103 surgical procedure types.
Six thousand two hundred nine discharges during the reporting period at Boston Children's Hospital comprised the cohort. Seven Surgical Length Categories were developed to group surgical procedure types. A multivariable model for outcome length of stay was built using a derivation cohort consisting of a 75% random sample, starting with Surgical Length Categories and considering additional a priori factors. Postoperative factors were then added to improve predictive performance. The remaining 25% of the cohort was used to validate the multivariable models. The coefficient of determination (R) was used to estimate the variability in length of stay explained by each factor. The Surgical Length Categories yielded an R of 42%. Model performance increased when the a priori factors preoperative status, noncardiac abnormality, genetic anomaly, preoperative catheterization during episode of care, weight less than 3 kg, and preoperative vasoactive support medication were introduced to the model (R = 60.8%). Model performance further improved when postoperative ventilation greater than 7 days, operating room time, postoperative catheterization during episode of care, postoperative reintubation, number of postoperative vasoactive support medications, postoperative ICU infection, and greater than or equal to one secondary surgical procedure were added (R = 76.7%). The validation cohort yielded an R of 76.5%.
We developed a statistically valid procedure-based categorical variable and multivariable model for length of stay of congenital heart surgeries. The Surgical Length Categories and important a priori and postoperative factors may be used to pursue a predictive tool for length of stay to inform scheduling and bed management practices.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,912,812
of 27,999,580 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#1,996
of 4,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,864
of 338,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#37
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,999,580 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
