↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Morphological suitability for endovascular repair, non-intervention rates, and operative mortality in women and men assessed for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: systematic reviews with meta-analysis
Published in
The Lancet, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30639-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 12%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 62 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 71 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 154. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#320,839
of 32,442,164 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#3,255
of 50,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,401
of 344,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#45
of 443 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,442,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 443 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.