↓ Skip to main content

Bypass of an anesthesiologist-directed preoperative evaluation clinic results in greater first-case tardiness and turnover times

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bypass of an anesthesiologist-directed preoperative evaluation clinic results in greater first-case tardiness and turnover times
Published in
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.04.009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We evaluated 4 hypotheses related to bypass of an anesthesiologist-directed preoperative evaluation clinics (APEC): 1) first-case tardiness and turnover times increased; 2) turnover times increased more than first-case tardiness; and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) resulted in both an ordered increase among ASA PS and within ASA PS in 3) first-case tardiness; and 4) turnover times. Retrospective observational study using electronic health records. One large, teaching hospital. An average of 14,310 patients per year undergoing elective surgery in the hospital's main opera rating rooms who were not inpatients preoperatively between 2006 and 2016. None. Average increases in first-case tardiness and turnover times between patients seen or not seen preoperatively in the APEC. APEC bypass increased first-case tardiness 2.58 min per case (CI 1.55-3.61; P<0.0001) and turnover times by 7.49 min (CI 6.79-8.19; P<0.0001). The increase in mean turnover time was greater than mean first-case tardiness (difference=4.91 min; CI 3.76-6.06; P<0.0001). Had all patients bypassed the APEC, the increase in total minutes OR- 1 workday- 1 for turnover times would have been larger than the increase in first-case tardiness (difference=5.71, CI 3.17-4.72; P<0.0001). There was an ordered increase with APEC bypass for both first-case tardiness and turnover times with increasing ASA PS (P<0.0001). Within ASA PS, first-case tardiness (all P-values<0.003) and turnover times (all P-values<0.0001) also increased with APEC bypass. All 4 hypotheses were accepted. Overall and with control for ASA PS, APEC bypass increases first-case tardiness and turnover times. A strategy of selective bypass of ASA PS 1-2 patients would not be effective economically because of substantial delays from ASA PS 2 patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,742,933
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#849
of 1,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,695
of 323,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
#10
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,861 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.