↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering the mechanisms of impaired decision-making

Overview of attention for article published in Social Neuroscience, February 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Deciphering the mechanisms of impaired decision-making
Published in
Social Neuroscience, February 2026
DOI 10.1080/17470919.2026.2634989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2026.
All research outputs
#8,841,611
of 32,588,054 outputs
Outputs from Social Neuroscience
#266
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,932
of 334,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Neuroscience
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,588,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.