↓ Skip to main content

Competitive impacts of an invasive nectar thief on plant–pollinator mutualisms

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Competitive impacts of an invasive nectar thief on plant–pollinator mutualisms
Published in
Ecology, June 2014
DOI 10.1890/13-1276.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cause Hanna, David Foote, Claire Kremen

Abstract

Plant-pollinator mutualisms are disrupted by a variety of competitive interactions between introduced and native floral visitors. The invasive western yellowjacket wasp, Vespula pensylvanica, is an aggressive nectar thief of the dominant endemic Hawaiian tree species, Metrosideros polymorpha. We conducted a large-scale, multiyear manipulative experiment to investigate the impacts of V. pensylvanica on the structure and behavior of the M. polymorpha pollinator community, including competitive mechanisms related to resource availability. Our results demonstrate that V. pensylvanica, through both superior exploitative and interference competition, influences resource partitioning and displaces native and nonnative M. polymorpha pollinators. Furthermore, the restructuring of the pollinator community due to V. pensylvanica competition and predation results in a significant decrease in the overall pollinator effectiveness and fruit set of M. polymorpha. This research highlights both the competitive mechanisms and contrasting effects of social insect invaders on plant-pollinator mutualisms and the role of competition in pollinator community structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Mexico 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 66%
Environmental Science 19 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 <1%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2014.
All research outputs
#17,284,201
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#5,853
of 6,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,098
of 234,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#51
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.