↓ Skip to main content

Differences in Negative T Waves Between Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Acute Coronary Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in Negative T Waves Between Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Acute Coronary Syndrome
Published in
Circulation Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masami Kosuge, Toshiaki Ebina, Kiyoshi Hibi, Kengo Tsukahara, Noriaki Iwahashi, Satoshi Umemura, Kazuo Kimura

Abstract

Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) often have negative T waves (Neg T) in precordial leads at presentation, but this is also found in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) caused by left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Other 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,301,374
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#179
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,230
of 320,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.