↓ Skip to main content

Sodium Bicarbonate for the Treatment of Lactic Acidosis

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
10 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sodium Bicarbonate for the Treatment of Lactic Acidosis
Published in
CHEST, January 2000
DOI 10.1378/chest.117.1.260
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lactic acidosis often challenges the intensivist and is associated with a strikingly high mortality. Treatment involves discerning and correcting its underlying cause, ensuring adequate oxygen delivery to tissues, reducing oxygen demand through sedation and mechanical ventilation, and (most controversially) attempting to alkalinize the blood with IV sodium bicarbonate. Here we review the literature to answer the following questions: Is a low pH bad? Can sodium bicarbonate raise the pH in vivo? Does increasing the blood pH with sodium bicarbonate have any salutary effects? Does sodium bicarbonate have negative side effects? We find that the oft-cited rationale for bicarbonate use, that it might ameliorate the hemodynamic depression of metabolic acidemia, has been disproved convincingly. Further, given the lack of evidence supporting its use, we cannot condone bicarbonate administration for patients with lactic acidosis, regardless of the degree of acidemia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 294 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 59 19%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Postgraduate 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 26 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 8%
Other 66 22%
Unknown 45 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 62%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Sports and Recreations 6 2%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 55 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2026.
All research outputs
#884,192
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#550
of 18,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#845
of 156,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#1
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.