↓ Skip to main content

Catalytic RNA

Overview of attention for book
Catalytic RNA
Elsevier
Attention for Chapter: The Structural and Functional Uniqueness of the glmS Ribozyme
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
The Structural and Functional Uniqueness of the glmS Ribozyme
Book title
Catalytic RNA
Published in
Progress in molecular biology and translational science, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-381286-5.00005-6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-381286-5
Authors

Soukup, Juliane K., Juliane K. Soukup

Abstract

The glmS bacterial ribozyme/riboswitch is found in a number of Gram-positive bacteria, many of which are human pathogens. Investigation of the structure and function of the glmS catalyst will aid in the development of artificial agonists/antagonists that might function as novel antibiotics. The glmS ribozyme is mechanistically unique in that it is the first RNA catalyst identified to require a coenzyme, glucosamine-6-phosphate, for RNA self-cleavage. In addition, it is the first riboswitch identified to utilize self-cleavage as a mode of genetic regulation in metabolism. Significant biochemical and biophysical data exist for the glmS ribozyme and aid in mechanistically understanding the importance of RNA and coenzyme structure to function in acid-base catalysis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Chemistry 5 25%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,270,226
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Progress in molecular biology and translational science
#467
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,632
of 284,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in molecular biology and translational science
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.