↓ Skip to main content

Volcanic stone sculptures of were-animals at Tiwanaku: pXRF and statistical analyses suggest regional geochemical provenance of chachapuma statues

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Volcanic stone sculptures of were-animals at Tiwanaku: pXRF and statistical analyses suggest regional geochemical provenance of chachapuma statues
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, September 2026
DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105858
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2026.
All research outputs
#11,068,072
of 32,851,407 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#1,403
of 3,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#985
of 3,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,851,407 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.