↓ Skip to main content

Latent TB infection and pulmonary TB disease among patients with diabetes mellitus in Bandung, Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Latent TB infection and pulmonary TB disease among patients with diabetes mellitus in Bandung, Indonesia
Published in
Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene, April 2017
DOI 10.1093/trstmh/trx015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Screening and treatment of latent TB infection (LTBI) and TB disease could reduce diabetes mellitus (DM)-associated TB. We aimed to describe the prevalence of LTBI and pulmonary TB among patients with DM in a TB-endemic setting. Patients with DM attending a hospital and community centres in Bandung, Indonesia, underwent LTBI screening using interferon gamma release assay (IGRA). TB was investigated by sputum smear, culture and x-ray. TB contacts from a parallel study were age- and sex-matched to patients with DM to compare LTBI and TB disease prevalence. Of 682 patients with DM screened, 651 (95.5%) were eligible. Among 'TB disease-free' patients, LTBI prevalence was 38.9% (206/530; 95% CI 34.7-43.2). Patients with DM were less likely to be IGRA positive than TB contacts (38.6%, 54/140; 95% CI 30.5-46.6 vs 68.6%, 96/140; 95% CI 60.9-72.3: p<0.001); but had a higher disease prevalence (4.9%, 8/164; 95% CI 1.6-8.2 vs 1.2%, 2/164; 95% CI -0.5 to 2.9: p=0.054). Patients with DM in crowded households had increased risk of LTBI (AOR 1.71; 95% CI 1.19-2.45). LTBI prevalence in patients with DM was lower than in household contacts, but patients with DM were more likely to have TB disease. Further studies should explore possible benefits of LTBI screening and preventive therapy in patients with DM in TB-endemic settings.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Lecturer 9 5%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 67 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 71 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2017.
All research outputs
#24,235,216
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene
#4,383
of 5,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,028
of 355,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.