↓ Skip to main content

Influences of enteral nutrition upon CEACAM6 expression by intestinal epithelial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Innate Immunity, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Influences of enteral nutrition upon CEACAM6 expression by intestinal epithelial cells
Published in
Innate Immunity, December 2013
DOI 10.1177/1753425913513309
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exclusive enteral nutrition is established as an initial therapy to induce remission in active Crohn's disease (CD), especially in children, but the mechanisms of action of this therapy are yet to be fully defined. CEACAM6 protein is an adhesion molecule that is up-regulated in active CD and implicated in the attachment of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC) to the gut epithelium. Using the Caco-2 human adenocarcinoma cell line, this study showed that the incubation of human cells with a polymeric formula (PF) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the expression of CEACAM6, and that this effect was most noticeable on the cell surface. Further investigation revealed that PF doubled the release of CEACAM6 protein by Caco-2 cells exposed to PF, and that an increase in release of soluble CEACAM6 inversely correlated with the ability of AIEC to associate with the intestinal epithelial cells. Our findings suggest that the secretion of cell surface-associated proteins acting as releasable decoys may be an aspect of the gut's innate immune response to pathogenic bacteria that is strengthened by PF in the setting of CD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 2 7%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#23,504,487
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Innate Immunity
#483
of 609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,923
of 323,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Innate Immunity
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 609 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.