↓ Skip to main content

E-Cadherin–Mediated Cell Contact Controls the Epidermal Damage Response in Radiation Dermatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
E-Cadherin–Mediated Cell Contact Controls the Epidermal Damage Response in Radiation Dermatitis
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jid.2017.03.036
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Radiotherapy is a primary oncological treatment modality, which also damages normal tissue including the skin and causes radiation dermatitis (RD). Here, we explore the mechanism of acute epidermal damage in RD. Two distinctive phases in the damage response were identified: an early destructive phase where a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induces loss of E-cadherin-mediated cell contact, followed by a regenerative phase where Wnt and Hippo signaling are activated. A blocking peptide, as well as a neutralizing antibody to E-cadherin, works synergistically with ionizing radiation to promote the epidermal damage. In addition, ROS disassembles adherens junctions (AJs) in epithelial cells via post-translational mechanisms, i.e. activation of Src/Abl kinases and degradation of β-catenin/E-cadherin. The key role of tyrosine kinases in this process is further substantiated by the rescue effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein, and the more specific Src/Abl kinase inhibitor dasatinib: Both reduced ROS-induced degradation of β-catenin/E-cadherin in vitro, and ameliorated skin damages in rodent models. Finally, we confirm that the same key molecular events are also seen in human RD. Therefore, we propose that loss of cell contact in epidermal keratinocytes through ROS-mediated disassembly of AJs is pivotal for the acute epidermal damage in RD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Engineering 3 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#8,111
of 8,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,345
of 323,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#109
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.